Note: You are reading this message either because your browser is not standards-compliant, or your browser failed to load our css files.

A description of the content follows : The article analyzes the dilemma, whether there is a chance that the rates in the market are going to fluctuate. The writer of the article presents pros and cons for this possibility.

Search SCN

Add to Google

Dow Jones 13211.99 -146.32 5:07 am PDT, August 1, 2007
NASDAQ 2546.27 +0.00 For info, visit www.smallcapnetwork.com
S & P 500 1455.27 +0.00 Change your subscription status here
Russell 2000 776.12 +0.00 VOLUME 07 : ISSUE 74
The Signs Point To Bullishness....I Think

I've been sitting at my desk for a while now (too long, actually), debating whether or not to even write today's edition on the topic I had planned. I've decided to, obviously. However, I'll also add that I felt a lot better about it Monday afternoon than I did on Tuesday afternoon. 

My dilemma is the need for certainty - not an easy thing for a stock speculator to handle, though I've learned to. 

My inspiration to go ahead and write it anyway? A trusted friend and fellow trader, who I think correctly pointed out how there's no such thing as trading perfection. Our collective challenge as market participants is just properly weighing the odds for what they really are - not for how we want to see them. 

Plus, I'd rather be proactive with a plan of action (even if I'm wrong) rather than reactive without a roadmap, scrambling to figure things out in a hurry. That's how mistakes happen. 

So with that - and despite Tuesday's rollback - I believe last week's robust market retreat may have actually set up a major upside opportunity over the next few weeks...perhaps enough to carry the indices into new high territory again. Read on and see if you agree with my case. 
 

The Evidence

The theme here is basically a short-term capitulation. A true long-term capitulation usually comes at the bottom of a long-term downtrend. But, we experience mini-capitulations all the time. 

And how does one spot such short-term bottom? I've found the following tools do a pretty good job..... 

ISE Sentiment Index - If anybody has previously followed the CBOE's put/call ratio, I recommend adding the ISE Sentiment Index to your repertoire. It's basically a call/put ratio, with a twist. 

The practical use of the ISE Index, for me, is as a sentiment tool.....and a contrarian indicator. A peak in bullish opinions is actually bearish, while a peak in bearish opinions is actually bullish. Sounds crazy, but it works. 

What's the twist? The CBOE's put/call reading has been around for a while, and it essentially aims to show the same type of broad opinion. The problem was/is, it measures put and call trade volume, rather than open option positions (which can make for a misleading ratio). Plus, so many fund managers and money managers now use options as a hedge, it's difficult to distinguish true market opinion from just a defensive measure. The ISE Index only incorporates open positions for retail traders. (For a better explanation of the ISE Sentiment Index, see this Market Wise column.)

Anyway, we saw the fear/bearishness measured by the ISE Index hit an extreme reading on Thursday - the third lowest reading for the index since October. The prior two were the readings of 58 on March 8th, and 74 on June 7th. Both came in front of rebounds - the March one in particular was powerful. We saw readings that low in June of last year as well, and you don't need me to tell you about the monster rally we saw start then. 

New NYSE/NASDAQ Lows - There are always stocks from each exchange hitting new all-time lows; seeing a few is no big deal. On the other hand, seeing an enormous amount just shortly after the market hit or challenged new all-time highs is a big deal.....as it's not likely to be sustainable. 

Let's arbitrarily look at the New York Stock Exchange's stocks hitting new lows on Thursday - there were more than 800 of them. That was the highest reading since May of 2004 (845), and a little shy of the 900+ figure we saw in July of 2002. Even after trading resumed following the September 11th, 2001 tragedy we didn't see the number of new lows swell up that much as they did Thursday. In both of those cases, and even after 9/11, the markets rallied very sharply for a few weeks. 

The NASDAQ's new low reading of 369 on Thursday was equally unusual, and potentially indicative of a bottom. 

CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) - The principal here is the same as with the ISE Index or the CBOE put/call ratio - interpreting extremes in investor opinions as signs of an impending market reversal. The only difference is simply that the VIX is based on option prices rather than trade volume

Historically, it's worked pretty well. In March, when the VIX shot up from just above 10 to above 20, the market was making a bottom when far too many people figured there was worse to come. Even the peak in late June spotted a short-term bullish swing. 

It's effective at spotting bearish scenarios too (though not quite as well lately). The VIX hit sharp bottoms in late December of 2004, late February of 2005, and July of 2005. Each instance occurred just a little while before the market found trouble. 

Anyway, when I saw the VIX hit new multi-year highs last week, I had to think the sellers were over-reacting. All the prior VIX spikes were short-lived; I don't know how or why this one would be any different. I see it as another bullish signal. 
 

The Counter Argument

Yes, there are a couple of potential pitfalls in my point of view. The first one is the calendar - it says we're overdue for weakness. July, August, and September are typically the most tepid time of the year, and actually the only negative quarter, on average. Even with last week's pullback relieving some pressure, the tendency looms.

In the same vein, we've yet to get a true, full-blown correction from the market, save the NASDAQ's dip in mid-2006. Most experts say a 10% decline is a normal-but-healthy correction. Not having one in months means there's still a lot of pent-up selling/profit-taking potential that should be burned off before we can really make a decent move higher.

In my opinion, both counter-arguments are valid. I do have responses though. To the first point, yes, the calendar says we should be headed into a bearish period. Yet, it didn't matter a bit last year...the summer rally turned into a fall rally without a second thought. Maybe we can climb the wall of worry again this year. 

To the second counter-argument, yes it's true - we've yet to really make a nice, healthy selloff that really washed off all the excess and started a complete rebuild of stock valuations. Maybe we are due, but if it hasn't been a problem in a couple of years (when interest rates were on the rise and oil was rallying like crazy), why would now be any different? 
 

Bottom Line

I'm sure you can understand my dilemma. I'm more of a momentum trader than a bottom-fisher, so buying into the market now is tough for me to embrace. To help my confidence out, I'm keeping a very tight leash on things by using the 200 day moving average line as my line in the sand for the Russell 3000 and the S&P 500. If a rebound isn't in the works, we should know soon enough - when all that support starts to break. See my recent blog entry for more on that. 

For the record though, I distinctly remember feeling pretty much the same way in June of last year right before the rally began.....for what it's worth. 

Fortunately, I have time on my side. The bounces that have occurred in the past following the signals above rarely took shape in just a day. Tuesday is proof of that. It might even take a couple of weeks to really get things going upward again, if they're actually meant to go that way. So, I'm not going to rush this idea. 

I may update these charts in the blog, though probably not in a newsletter. However, the discussion isn't over for me; my comments above just scratch the surface of everything I'm processing right now. For more, check out the blog over the next few days. I just wanted to give you a 'best of' glimpse today to let you start thinking about things - whether or not my tools are right. I believe they are, but we'll see. Stay tuned. 
 

 
We Value Your Feedback
 
Got comments, questions or suggestions? Send 'em on over: Email the Editor

If you wish to send a written request or inquiry, please send it to our physical address:

TGR Group, LLC
4653 Carmel Mtn Rd Suite 308 #402
San Diego, CA 92130

New Articles On The Homepage
If you've only been getting the e-mail version of the newsletter, or only read the blog, here's what you've missed on our homepage.... 

Heating Up:Is Tech Waking Up While REITs Fall Asleep?

Technology Trends:The Looming Paradigm Shift In Data Storage

Trader's Corner:Hot or Cold? It Doesn't Matter To This Company

Remember, you can only find this exclusive commentary at the Small Cap Network homepage

 
Zupintra Adds New Clients - Closer To The Goal
As promised in a recent blog entry on Zupintra Corporation (OTCBB: ZUPC), I'm going to be following the company very closely as their revenue story unfolds. As it turns out, they recently took another step in the right direction. 

In short, new clients (long-distance providers) are starting to use Zupintra's network to terminate phone call (i.e. connect to the call's recipient). No word on how many clients, calls, or dollars are associated with this initial small-scale launch. Zupintra has been fairly secretive when it comes to that kind of proprietary stuff. 

More importantly, the financing capabilities that allowed Zupintra to start terminating some calls in the Zupintra network were indeed part of the two-edged insurance & credit requirement. 

As you might recall, the big players don't pay as you go for connection and termination services - they want to be billed later. The company needed accounts receivable insurance (which they already had), but also letters of credit (which they were trying to get). We've now learned that at least some of the letters of credit they were seeking from Londesborough have indeed been approved. Initially, the Londesborough line of credit is worth $5 million. But, with the relationship now forged, it will be much easier to scale into bigger lines of credit.

I'm still waiting to see them turn this financial capability into revenue. Overall though, this is encouraging. 

 
Titan Global, Take Two
Don't blink - you might miss something. Just a day and a half after announcing they were buying Appalachian Oil (AOGA.PK) and creating an energy division from it, Titan Global (OTCBB: TTGL) already issued their first energy-related news release. 

NewGen Technologies (OTCBB: NWGN) has been named the exclusive biofuel manufacturer/provider for Appalachian Oil. The agreement is good for a ten year period. 

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see this biofuel deal was intrinsically linked to the Appco acquisition. It looks like a proverbial win-win-win to me. In fact, NewGen's Chairman is quoted in the press release as saying they were looking to partner with Appco anyway, in order to take advantage of their strong distribution capabilities and terminal network in the southeast United States. 

For more, click here.

Subscribe
Information is power and timely information is profitable. Become informed and profit from Small Cap Network Profiles and Trading Alerts by becoming a Preferred Member today. There is no cost associated with your email subscription. Add your email address below and make sure to check your email inbox and confirm your opt-in request to start receiving the Small Cap Network Email Newsletter on a regular basis.

To ensure newsletter delivery, you can add any additional email addresses you may have to the Small Cap Network Member List. Receiving the Small Cap Network Newsletter in multiple locations is the best way of making sure you don't miss the next investing or trading opportunity! For web based email addresses, the Small Cap Network recommends @yahoo.com or @aol.com for timely and reliable email newsletter delivery.


Subscribe Here

Note: Your email address will be kept strictly confidential, and will not be shared with any other entity for any purpose at any time. If you no longer wish to receive the Small Cap Network Newsletter, simply follow the instructions located at the bottom of every Small Cap Network Newsletter Edition.

Unsubscribe Here
D I S C L A I M E R:
The Small Cap Network, its website and email newsletter (hereafter, cumulatively referred to as "SCN") , is an independent electronic publication committed to providing its readers with factual information on select publicly traded companies. SCN is owned and operated by TGR Group, LLC ("TGR"). All companies are chosen on the basis of certain financial analysis and other pertinent criteria with a view toward maximizing the upside potential for investors while minimizing the downside risk, whenever possible. Moreover, as detailed below, TGR accepts compensation from third party consultants and/or companies, which it features in the publication and circulation of SCN. To the degrees enumerated herein, SCN should not be regarded as an independent publication. 

Click Here or go to http://www.smallcapnetwork.com/compensation_disclosure.html to view our compensation on every company we have ever covered, or visit the following web address: http://www.smallcapnetwork.com/profile_disclosure.html for our full profiles and http://www.smallcapnetwork.com/short_term_alerts.html for Trading Alerts. 

TGR Group, LLC has been paid a fee of $30,000 cash and 1,000,000 shares of newly issued restricted stock by Zupintra Corporation, Inc. for coverage of the Company.

TGR Group LLC has been paid a fee of $30,000 cash by Titan General for coverage of the company. In addition, TGR Group LLC has been pledged a fee of 100,000 warrants convertible at $1 into restricted shares by Trilogy Capital for coverage of the company.

From time to time TGR sells shares received as compensation for coverage of client companies. Shares received are sold in the open market. Since the shares are received as compensation for services as previously disclosed, and not for investment purposes, TGR does not view the sale of the shares as contradictory to any opinions delivered in the content. This should be viewed as a conflict of interest by shareholders or prospective shareholders of the client companies. 

TGR, its Members and Members' families, are forbidden by company policy to own, buy, sell or otherwise trade stock for their own benefit in the companies who appear in the publication unless specifically disclosed. 

All statements and expressions are the sole opinions of TGR and are subject to change without notice. A profile, description, or other mention of a company within SCN is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or sell any securities mentioned. While we believe all sources of information to be factual and reliable, in no way do we represent or guarantee the accuracy thereof, nor the statements made herein. 

The profiles, critiques, and other editorial content of SCN may contain statements that appear foward relating to the expected capabilities of the companies mentioned herein. 

THE READER SHOULD VERIFY ALL CLAIMS AND DO THEIR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING IN ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED. INVESTING IN SECURITIES IS SPECULATIVE AND CARRIES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THIS PROFILE IS PROTECTED BY THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE COPIED, OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED, WRITTEN CONSENT OF TGR. 

We encourage our readers to invest carefully and read the investor information available at the web sites of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at http://www.sec.gov and/or the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") at http://www.nasd.com. We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be found at http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm. Readers can review all public filings by companies at the SEC's EDGAR page. The NASD has published information on how to invest carefully at its web site.


 

Click Here to View the SmallCap Network Disclosure